Blog

<h2>Introduction: The Magical Thinking Trap</h2><p>Picture this:</p><p>A marketer walks into a dimly lit room where a hooded figure—the MMM Modeller—sits behind a glowing screen. The marketer drops a USB drive on the table and says:</p><p>"Here’s my data. Tell me exactly how much ROI my TikTok ads are driving. And make it snappy."</p><p>The modeller sighs. "If only it worked that way."</p><p>This, dear readers, is the Great MMM Expectation Gap—the chasm between what marketers think MMM does and what it actually requires.</p><p>In this article, we’ll explore:</p><p>✅ Why MMM isn’t a magic "ROAS calculator" (Sorry, no crystal balls here.)</p><p>✅ The dirty secret: Human tweaks make the model "work"<br></p><p>✅ Why you (yes, YOU) must lead the MMM project<br></p><p>✅ How bad data habits sabotage your results</p><p>✅ Dashboards vs. MMM: Why surface metrics lie</p><p>Buckle up. We’re about to align expectations with reality—with a few laughs along the way.</p><h2>Chapter 1: "MMM Should Just Automatically Give Me Perfect Answers!"</h2><h3>The Marketer’s Dream</h3><p>"I uploaded my data. Where’s my perfect ROAS breakdown?"</p><p>Many marketers assume MMM is like a vending machine:</p><ul><li>Insert data.<br></li><li>Press button.<br></li><li>Receive flawless insights.</li></ul><h3>Reality check: MMM is more like baking sourdough.</h3><ul><li>You need the right ingredients (clean data).<br></li><li>You must knead the dough (tweak model parameters).<br></li><li>Sometimes, it flops (and you start over).</li></ul><h3>Why MMM Isn’t Magic</h3><p><strong>Non-linear transformations aren’t automatic.</strong></p><ul><li style="list-style-type: none;" data-mce-style="list-style-type: none;"><ul style="list-style-type: circle;" data-mce-style="list-style-type: circle;"><li>Adstock rates? Someone (a human) must set them.<br></li><li>Diminishing returns curves? Also human-tuned.</li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>Models need guardrails.</strong><br></p><ul><li style="list-style-type: none;" data-mce-style="list-style-type: none;"><ul style="list-style-type: circle;" data-mce-style="list-style-type: circle;"><li>If TikTok’s ROAS comes back as "500%," the modeller knows that’s <span style="font-family: inherit; font-weight: inherit;" data-mce-style="font-family: inherit; font-weight: inherit;">nonsense and adjusts.</span></li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>Garbage in = Garbage out.</strong><br></p><ul><li style="list-style-type: none;" data-mce-style="list-style-type: none;"><ul style="list-style-type: circle;" data-mce-style="list-style-type: circle;"><li>If your data is messy, the model will be too.</li></ul></li></ul><h3>The Fix:</h3><ul><li>Accept that MMM requires iteration.<br></li><li>Demand transparency on how parameters are set.</li></ul><h2>Chapter 2: "I’ll Just Send the Data and Check Out Mentally."</h2><h3>The Marketer’s Hope</h3><p>"I’ve got a modeller on the case. My work here is done."</p><h3>Reality: You’re the project lead.</h3><p>The modeller is your sous-chef—not the head cook.</p><h3>Why You Can’t Ghost Your MMM Project</h3><p><strong>You know your business better than the modeller.</strong></p><ul><li style="list-style-type: none;" data-mce-style="list-style-type: none;"><ul style="list-style-type: circle;" data-mce-style="list-style-type: circle;"><li>Was there a supply chain hiccup in Q3? Tell them.<br></li><li>Did you test a new creative in June? Flag it.<br></li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>Your expectations shape the model.</strong><br></p><ul><li style="list-style-type: none;" data-mce-style="list-style-type: none;"><ul style="list-style-type: circle;" data-mce-style="list-style-type: circle;"><li>Example: *"TV’s impact should be 20-40%, not 5%."*<br></li><li>Without guidance, the modeller flies blind.<br></li></ul></li></ul><h3>The Fix:</h3><ul><li>Set clear boundaries for key metrics (e.g., ROAS ranges).<br></li><li>Review interim outputs—don’t wait for the final report.</li></ul><h2>Chapter 3: "If the Model’s Wrong, It’s the Modeller’s Fault!"</h2><h3>The Marketer’s Defense</h3><p>"I didn’t build this thing. Blame the nerds!"</p><h3>Reality: You signed off on every step.</h3><p><strong>Shared Accountability in MMM</strong></p><table style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%;" border="1" data-mce-style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%;"><tbody><tr><td style="width: 50%;" data-mce-style="width: 50%;"><em><strong>Party</strong></em></td><td style="width: 50%;" data-mce-style="width: 50%;"><em><strong>Responsibilities</strong></em></td></tr><tr><td style="width: 50%;" data-mce-style="width: 50%;">Marketer</td><td style="width: 50%;" data-mce-style="width: 50%;">Provide clean data, set business guardrails, milestone check, review outputs</td></tr><tr><td style="width: 50%;" data-mce-style="width: 50%;">Modeller</td><td style="width: 50%;" data-mce-style="width: 50%;">Build statistically sound models, explain assumptions</td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong>Classic Failures (And Who’s Really to Blame):</strong></p><ul><li>"The model says billboards have 0.001% impact!" Did you tell the modeller billboards were a branding play? (Your fault.)<br></li><li>"Why is ROAS so volatile?" Did you share channel budget changes? (Also your fault.)</li></ul><h3>The Fix:</h3><ul><li>Treat MMM as a collaboration.<br></li><li>Document all inputs and feedback.</li></ul><h2>Chapter 4: "Data Quality Isn’t My Problem."</h2><h3>The Marketer’s Attitude</h3><p>"Here’s a messy Excel file. Good luck!"</p><h3>Reality: Bad data = Bad decisions.</h3><h3>The 3 Data Sins Marketers Commit</h3><ul><li>Sending unaggregated logs: "here’s 4M rows of raw records!" → Modellers weep.<br></li><li>Ignoring missing data: "we didn’t track LinkedIn spend in Q1. Oops!"<br></li><li>No metadata: "promo_Code_47" means nothing. Label your columns.</li></ul><h3>War Story:</h3><p>A client once sent "media spend" data where TikTok was labeled "TT." The modeller assumed it meant "TV." The model was… creative.</p><h3>The Fix:</h3><ul><li>Use consistent naming conventions.<br></li><li>Provide a data dictionary.</li></ul><h2>Chapter 5: "Dashboards Are Enough. MMM Is Overkill."</h2><h3>The Marketer’s Argument</h3><p>"My dashboard shows CTRs! What more do I need?"</p><h3>Reality: Dashboards are rearview mirrors. MMM is GPS.</h3><p><strong>Vanity Metrics vs. MMM Insights</strong></p><table style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%;" border="1" data-mce-style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%;"><tbody><tr><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;"><em><strong>Metric</strong></em></td><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;"><em><strong>What It Tells You</strong></em></td><td style="width: 33.335%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.335%;"><em><strong>What It Hides</strong></em></td></tr><tr><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;"><em><strong>Impressions</strong></em></td><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;">How many saw your ad</td><td style="width: 33.335%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.335%;">Whether it drove sales</td></tr><tr><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;"><em><strong>CTR</strong></em></td><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;">Engagement rate</td><td style="width: 33.335%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.335%;">If clicks led to conversions</td></tr><tr><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;"><em><strong>CPC</strong></em></td><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;">Cost efficiency</td><td style="width: 33.335%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.335%;">ROAS per channel</td></tr></tbody></table><h3>Why MMM Digs Deeper:</h3><ul><li>Adstocking → Captures long-term effects.<br></li><li>Diminishing returns → Finds saturation points.<br></li><li>Baseline estimation → Separates marketing impact from organic growth.</li></ul><h3>The Fix:</h3><ul><li>Use dashboards for monitoring, MMM for strategy.</li></ul><h2>Conclusion: Bridging the Expectation Gap</h2><h3>The New MMM Mindset</h3><ul><li>MMM isn’t magic. It’s a tool that needs tuning.<br></li><li>You’re the project owner. Modellers are your allies.<br></li><li>Data quality is YOUR job. Don’t dump and run.<br></li><li>Dashboards ≠ Insights. Demand deeper analysis.</li></ul><h3>Final Thought: MMM Is a Superpower (If You Use It Right)</h3><p>The best marketers don’t just consume MMM—they command it.</p><p><strong>So next time you kick off an MMM project, ask yourself:</strong></p><p><strong><em>"Am I treating this like a vending machine… or a high-performance engine?"</em></strong></p>

The Great MMM Expectation Gap: Why Marketers Get Frustrated (And How to Fix It)

<h2>Introduction: The Wizardry Behind the Curtain</h2><p>Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM) is often treated like the oracle of marketing analytics—a mystical tool that reveals the truth about which ads work, where budgets should go, and how to maximize ROAS. Companies pour millions into MMM studies, trusting the outputs to guide billion-dollar decisions.</p><p>But what if the oracle isn’t as infallible as it seems?</p><p>Behind the polished reports and confident recommendations, there’s a world of statistical wizardry, clever workarounds, and a few… let’s call them optimizations that vendors don’t always advertise.</p><p>This isn’t an exposé meant to vilify MMM providers—after all, the technique remains one of the most robust ways to measure marketing effectiveness. Instead, think of this as a backstage pass—revealing the tricks of the trade so marketers can ask better questions, demand more transparency, and ultimately get more value from their MMM investments.</p><p>By the end of this deep dive, you’ll understand:</p><p>✅ The subtle (and sometimes sneaky) ways MMM models are "tuned" to look better than they are</p><p>✅ Why transparency is still a major hurdle in MMM adoption<br></p><p>✅ How open-source tools are changing the game (but still have big limitations)<br></p><p>✅ What marketers should demand from MMM vendors to avoid misleading results</p><p>Let’s pull back the curtain.</p><h2>Chapter 1: The Illusion of Perfect Fit – How Dummy Variables Mask Reality</h2><h3>The Problem: Models Need to Explain the Past</h3><p>At its core, MMM is a regression-based analysis that connects marketing inputs (ad spend, promotions, pricing) to business outcomes (sales, conversions, revenue). The goal? Find the mathematical relationship that best explains historical performance.</p><p>But here’s the catch: Real-world data is messy.</p><ul><li>Random demand spikes (unrelated to marketing)<br></li><li>External shocks (e.g., a competitor’s blunder)<br></li><li>Data collection errors</li></ul><p>A truly "perfect" model would account for all these anomalies. But since that’s impossible, MMM practitioners use dummy variables—special binary flags that "explain" unexpected deviations.</p><h3>The Secret: Some Dummy Variables Are… Made Up</h3><p>In an ideal world, dummy variables are only used when:</p><ul><li>A major one-time event occurred (e.g., a PR crisis)<br></li><li>A data error is confirmed (e.g., tracking failure)</li></ul><p>But in reality? Many models overuse dummies to force a better fit.</p><ul><li>No clear reason for a sales spike? "Let’s add a dummy."<br></li><li>Model residuals look too erratic? "Maybe a few more dummies will smooth things out."</li></ul><h3>Why does this happen?</h3><ul><li>Clients love clean models. A low error margin feels more "scientific."<br></li><li>It’s hard to prove a dummy is unjustified. ("Maybe there was a local event we don’t know about?")<br></li><li>No one audits the model’s internals. Most clients just see the final output.</li></ul><h3>The Risk: Overfitting Leads to Misleading Explanations</h3><p>A model that fits historical data too perfectly may not actually explain the true drivers of performance. Instead, it memorizes noise—random fluctuations, one-off events, or data quirks—and mistakes them for real patterns.</p><h3>How to spot this?</h3><ul><li>Request dummy variable documentation (what events do they represent?)<br></li><li>Validate against buinsess intuition (If the model claims promotions drove 60% of sales, ask: "when did these promotions run, what type were they, and how do they align with our actual campaign data?")<br></li></ul><h2>Chapter 2: The "Random Noise" Trick – Gaming Statistical Tests</h2><h3>The Problem: Models Must Pass Diagnostic Checks</h3><p>For an MMM model to be statistically valid, it must pass several tests:</p><p>✅ Residual normality (errors should follow a bell curve)<br>✅ Homoscedasticity (errors should have constant variance)<br>✅ No autocorrelation (errors shouldn’t be linked over time)</p><p>If the model fails these, clients (rightfully) get skeptical.</p><h3>The Secret: Some Models Cheat with Random Noise</h3><p>When residuals fail tests, some modellers add random variables—tiny, meaningless fluctuations—to make the errors appear more random.</p><h3>How it works:</h3><ul><li>The model initially fails a test (e.g., residuals are skewed).<br></li><li>The modeller injects artificial random white noise.<br></li><li>Suddenly, the residuals look "perfect."</li></ul><h3>Why does this happen?</h3><ul><li>Clients rarely check diagnostics. They focus on ROI numbers.<br></li><li>Failing tests can delay projects. Tweaking residuals speeds up delivery.</li></ul><h3>The Risk: False Confidence in Flawed Models</h3><p>A model that "passes" tests artificially may still give bad recommendations.</p><h3>How to protect yourself:</h3><ul><li>Ask for pre- and post-adjustment diagnostics<br></li><li>Require transparency on all model inputs</li></ul><h2>Chapter 3: The Black Box of Adstock &amp; Diminishing Returns</h2><h3>The Problem: Media Effects Aren’t Linear</h3><p>A dollar spent on TV doesn’t have the same impact as a dollar on Facebook. MMM accounts for this using:</p><ul><li>Adstock: How long an ad’s effect lingers (e.g., TV ads decay slower)<br></li><li>Diminishing returns: The point where extra spending stops working</li></ul><h3>The Secret: Parameters Are Often Arbitrary</h3><p>The formulas for these transformations rely on hidden parameters—numbers like:</p><ul><li>Decay rates (How fast does TV impact fade?)<br></li><li>Saturation points (When does Facebook stop working?)</li></ul><h3>The issue? Many vendors:</h3><ul><li>Don’t disclose how they set these values<br></li><li>Over-tune them to reduce collinearity (making the model look cleaner)</li></ul><h3>Why does this happen?</h3><ul><li>Clients rarely ask. They assume it’s "science."<br></li><li>It’s easier than finding true causality.</li></ul><h3>The Risk: Misguided Budget Allocations</h3><p>If Adstock rates are wrong, the model may overvalue long-tail channels (e.g., TV) and undervalue short-term ones (e.g., search ads).</p><h3>How to fight back:</h3><ul><li>Demand sensitivity analysis (show how results change with different parameters)<br></li><li>Compare against experimental data (e.g., geo lift tests)<br></li></ul><h2>Chapter 4: The Transparency Dilemma – Who’s Really Running the Show?</h2><h3>The Problem: Most MMM Is a Black Box</h3><p>Clients send data to vendors and get back insights. But what happens in between?</p><h3>The Three MMM Business Models</h3><table style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%;" border="1" data-mce-style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%;" data-mce-selected="1"><tbody><tr><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;"><em><strong>Type</strong></em></td><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;"><em><strong>How It Works</strong></em></td><td style="width: 33.335%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.335%;"><em><strong>Transparency Level</strong></em></td></tr><tr><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;"><em><strong>Traditional Consulting</strong></em></td><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;">Human modellers tweak data behind the scenes</td><td style="width: 33.335%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.335%;">❌ Low (you see only final outputs)</td></tr><tr><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;"><em><strong>SaaS MMM</strong></em></td><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;">Data scientists execute the modeling process in the backend, with final results surfaced in the dashboard interface</td><td style="width: 33.335%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.335%;">⚠️ Medium (but who checks the backend work?)</td></tr><tr><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;"><em><strong>Open-source MMM (e.g., Google Meridian, Meta Robyn)</strong></em></td><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;">Marketers build models themselves</td><td style="width: 33.335%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.335%;">✅ High (but requires coding skills)</td></tr></tbody></table><h3>The Secret: Even SaaS Tools Have Hidden Tweaks</h3><p>Many SaaS platforms claim transparency but:</p><ul><li>Pre-process data in opaque ways<br></li><li>Apply hidden business rules (e.g., capping unrealistic coefficients)</li></ul><h3>Why does this happen?</h3><ul><li>Fully transparent models often look "ugly." Clients prefer clean stories.<br></li><li>SaaS automation requires assumptions. Vendors don’t always disclose them.</li></ul><h3>The Risk: Blind Trust in Black Boxes</h3><p>Without visibility, clients can’t audit recommendations.</p><h3>How to demand better:</h3><ul><li>Ask for raw model outputs (not just dashboards)<br></li><li>Require documentation on all automated adjustments</li></ul><h2>Chapter 5: The Future of MMM – More Automation, Less Wizardry</h2><h3>The Good News: Tech Is Making MMM Faster &amp; Cheaper</h3><ul><li>Open-source tools (Meridian, Robyn) reduce vendor lock-in.<br></li><li>Automated data pipelines cut manual work.<br></li><li>Real-time MMM is emerging (no more annual reports).</li></ul><h3>The Bad News: The Core Challenges Remain</h3><ul><li>Small businesses still can’t afford good MMM.<br></li><li>Non-technical marketers struggle with open-source tools.<br></li><li>Vendors still control too much opacity.</li></ul><h3>What Marketers Should Do Next</h3><ul><li>Ask harder questions (How are Adstock rates set? Can I see residuals?)<br></li><li>Combine MMM with experiments (e.g., geo tests for validation)<br></li><li>Push for SaaS tools with full transparency</li></ul><h2>Conclusion: MMM Is Powerful—But Demand Transparency</h2><p>Marketing Mix Modeling isn’t going away. Despite its flaws, it remains one of the best ways to connect marketing spend to business outcomes.</p><p>But like any powerful tool, it can be misused—intentionally or not.</p><h3>The solution?</h3><ul><li>Treat MMM as a guide, not gospel.<br></li><li>Demand full transparency from vendors.</li><li>Combine it with other measurement methods.</li></ul><p>The best MMM providers aren’t the ones with the flashiest models. </p><p>They’re the ones who show their work—dummy variables, Adstock assumptions, and all.</p><p><strong>So next time you get an MMM report, ask:</strong></p><p><strong><em>"How much of this is science… and how much is statistical storytelling?"</em></strong></p><p><em>Disclaimer: No MMM vendors were harmed in the making of this article. (But a few may be nervously double-checking their dummy variables.)</em></p>

The Hidden Secrets of Marketing Mix Modeling Service Providers They’d Rather Keep Quiet

<h2>Understanding the Basics of Marketing Analytics</h2>
<p>Marketing analytics can seem daunting, especially for small businesses with limited budgets. However, understanding the basics is the first step towards mastering it without overspending. At its core, marketing analytics involves collecting and analyzing data to understand customer behaviors and optimize marketing strategies. By leveraging the right tools and techniques, businesses can gain valuable insights and make data-driven decisions.</p>

<p>Investing in marketing analytics doesn't have to mean high costs. There are numerous affordable tools available that offer comprehensive analytics solutions. These tools can help track website traffic, measure campaign performance, and understand customer engagement.</p>

<figure id="figure-p0tuj9suhkm9scupg1"><img id="p0tuj9suhkm9scupg1" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/1954841243/photo/data-analysis-chart-graph-3d-statistics-background.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=JqlWDrRuqpKotSJiWlw9XEKfqmlar9qw3g5TGMGWdVk=" alt="marketing analytics tools" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<h2>Utilizing Free and Low-Cost Tools</h2>
<p>Free tools like Google Analytics are a great starting point for businesses looking to dive into marketing analytics without spending a fortune. Google Analytics provides insights into user behavior, traffic sources, and conversion rates, helping businesses understand how well their marketing efforts are performing.</p>

<p>Additionally, platforms such as Facebook Insights and Twitter Analytics offer valuable data on social media engagement. These tools are free to use and can help businesses monitor their social media performance and adjust strategies accordingly.</p>

<h2>Leveraging Data for Better Decision-Making</h2>
<p>Once you have the tools in place, it's crucial to know how to use the data effectively. Data-driven decision-making is about using insights from analytics to guide your marketing strategies. For instance, understanding peak traffic times or the most engaging types of content can help in scheduling posts and creating more targeted campaigns.</p>

<p>Regularly reviewing analytics reports ensures that you stay on top of trends and make informed decisions. This approach not only helps in maximizing marketing efforts but also in aligning them with business goals.</p>

<figure id="figure-ihu4r76kijm9scupg1"><img id="ihu4r76kijm9scupg1" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/2166193838/photo/a-man-reviews-the-data-analysis-of-marketing-from-social-media-platforms.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=bp1wg81DHuHMul6h4DuLYX_KcWxvhqMUGmcjpNBQ6eI=" alt="data driven decisions" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<h2>Building an Analytics-Focused Culture</h2>
<p>Creating an analytics-focused culture within your organization can enhance the effectiveness of your marketing strategies. Encourage team members to embrace data-driven decisions and provide training on using analytics tools effectively. This will empower your team to contribute to marketing success actively.</p>

<p>Moreover, promoting a culture that values data can lead to more innovative solutions and a greater understanding of customer needs. This cultural shift often results in more strategic and efficient marketing efforts.</p>

<h2>Monitoring Performance and Adjusting Strategies</h2>
<p>An essential part of mastering marketing analytics is regularly monitoring performance and adjusting strategies as necessary. Set clear KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) to measure success and identify areas for improvement.</p>

<p>Creating a feedback loop where you continuously analyze outcomes and tweak strategies ensures that your marketing remains agile and responsive to changes in the market.</p>

<figure id="figure-gxrt5orbnim9scupg1"><img id="gxrt5orbnim9scupg1" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/2101122136/photo/woman-hand-holding-tv-remote.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=ddxB5uLrJZA1Ru8MnZjWf9BRdo6vmFkb7EjnXDWLdrs=" alt="performance monitoring" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<h2>Conclusion: Making Analytics Work for You</h2>
<p>By focusing on affordable tools, leveraging data for decision-making, fostering an analytics-centric culture, and continuously monitoring performance, businesses can master marketing analytics without breaking the bank. The key is to start simple, gradually build your capabilities, and always keep your business objectives in mind.</p>

<p>With a strategic approach, even small businesses can harness the power of marketing analytics to drive growth and stay competitive in today's dynamic market landscape.</p>

Mastering Marketing Analytics Without Breaking the Bank

<h2>Unlocking the Power of a Free Marketing Mix Platform</h2>
<p>In today's fast-paced digital landscape, businesses must stay agile and responsive to ever-changing consumer demands. A well-defined marketing strategy is crucial, but with so many tools and platforms available, it can be overwhelming to select the right mix. That's where our free marketing mix platform comes into play, offering instant insights that can transform your strategy.</p>

<figure id="figure-2ga97juj6qm9o2j26d"><img id="2ga97juj6qm9o2j26d" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/629303228/photo/im-happy-to-explain.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=WEmzS8V0sMIhn9i-_wyF5Cs9Iyk4Ye2AfzGK4jmkLt4=" alt="marketing strategy" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<h3>The Importance of a Balanced Marketing Mix</h3>
<p>The term "marketing mix" refers to the set of actions or tactics a company uses to promote its brand or product in the market. Traditionally, this includes the four Ps: Product, Price, Place, and Promotion. However, in the digital age, this concept has expanded to include People, Process, and Physical evidence. A balanced marketing mix ensures that all aspects of your marketing strategy work in harmony to achieve your business goals.</p>

<p>With our platform, you can easily analyze and adjust these components to better suit your target audience. By doing so, you're not only improving brand visibility but also enhancing customer satisfaction and loyalty.</p>

<h3>Instant Insights for Informed Decision-Making</h3>
<p>One of the standout features of our platform is the ability to provide instant insights. These insights are crucial for making informed decisions quickly and efficiently. With real-time data at your fingertips, you can identify trends, track performance metrics, and adjust your strategy on the fly. This agility is key in maintaining a competitive edge in today's dynamic market.</p>

<figure id="figure-0wb8uwdul7m9o2j26d"><img id="0wb8uwdul7m9o2j26d" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/2157709105/photo/data-fabric-ai-artificial-intelligence-powered-analytics-data-data-verse-big-data-data.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=gYImeeQslIntNzWrO8iIyRALiovJOudFMtQ4GEeUQm8=" alt="data analytics" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<p>Our platform's intuitive dashboard allows you to visualize data through easy-to-understand charts and graphs. This visual representation helps you grasp complex information effortlessly, enabling you to focus on strategic planning rather than getting bogged down by data analysis.</p>

<h3>Comprehensive Tools for Enhanced Performance</h3>
<p>Beyond insights, our platform offers a suite of comprehensive tools designed to enhance your marketing performance. From campaign management to customer segmentation and beyond, these tools streamline your marketing efforts and ensure that every dollar spent is maximized for return on investment.</p>

<ul>
  <li><b>Campaign Management:</b> Plan, execute, and track campaigns across multiple channels with ease.</li>
  <li><b>Customer Segmentation:</b> Tailor your messages to specific audience segments for more personalized communication.</li>
  <li><b>Performance Analytics:</b> Monitor key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure success and identify areas for improvement.</li>
</ul>

<h3>Free Access to Transform Your Strategy</h3>
<p>The best part? Our platform is completely free to use. We believe that every business, regardless of size or budget, should have access to the tools necessary to succeed. By offering this platform at no cost, we aim to democratize access to powerful marketing insights and tools.</p>

<figure id="figure-ebb7xn0l7om9o2j26d"><img id="ebb7xn0l7om9o2j26d" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/1887449067/photo/confident-businessman-in-modern-office.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=t7lPpv8khkhF5ZXW1w5wQLekaIqG_8Tb_LJ87_mFLz0=" alt="business growth" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<p>Whether you're a small startup or an established enterprise, our free marketing mix platform empowers you to refine your strategy and drive results. Don't let budget constraints hinder your growth—leverage our platform's capabilities today and see the transformation for yourself.</p>

<h3>Conclusion: Embrace the Future of Marketing</h3>
<p>The future of marketing is data-driven and customer-centric. By utilizing our free marketing mix platform, you position your business at the forefront of this evolution. Gain instant insights, make informed decisions, and unlock new levels of success in your marketing endeavors. Embrace the future with confidence and transform your strategy like never before.</p>

Instant Insights: How Our Free Marketing Mix Platform Transforms Your Strategy

<h2>Introduction</h2><p>Marketing Mix Modelling (MMM) remains a cornerstone of marketing analytics, helping brands measure the effectiveness of their campaigns and optimize budgets. However, the process of tuning and refining MMM models is notoriously complex, requiring deep statistical expertise and patience.</p><p>Two of the most prominent open-source MMM tools—Google Meridian (a Bayesian MMM framework) and Meta Robyn (an evolutionary computing-based MMM solution)—promise to simplify this process. Yet, in practice, both tools suffer from inefficiencies, uncontrollable tuning mechanisms, and time-consuming iterations that frustrate data scientists and marketers alike.</p><p>In this article, we’ll dissect why these tools fail to deliver a smooth MMM tuning experience, the technical and practical challenges they introduce, and how real-world users struggle with them.</p><h2>The Problem with Google Meridian: A Bayesian Nightmare</h2><p>Google Meridian adopts a Bayesian approach to MMM, leveraging Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling to estimate media effects. While Bayesian methods offer flexibility, Meridian’s implementation introduces several pain points:</p><h3>Prior Distribution Tweaking is Inefficient and Unpredictable</h3><ul><li><strong>"Spray and Pray" Methodology</strong>: Adjusting prior distributions (e.g., for media coefficients) feels like a blind optimization process. There’s no clear guidance on how changes will impact the final model.<br></li><li><strong>Unstable Adjustments</strong>: Modifying one prior often unexpectedly shifts other variables, destabilizing the model. Without constraints, coefficients can drift into unrealistic ranges (e.g., negative ROAS for TV ads).<br></li><li><strong>No Guarantee of Marketing-Friendly Outputs</strong>: Bayesian models prioritize statistical fit over business logic. Marketers expect ROAS and contribution shares to align with spend—but Meridian often produces counterintuitive results that require manual overrides.<br></li></ul><h3>MCMC is Slow and Uncontrollable</h3><ul><li><strong>Random Sampling ≠ Controlled Optimization</strong>: MCMC explores parameter space randomly, meaning convergence is slow—especially with large datasets.<br></li><li><strong>No Constraints on Realism</strong>: Unrestricted sampling can yield implausible coefficients (e.g., a tiny digital ad spend driving massive sales). Users must manually enforce constraints (e.g., via half-normal priors), but this is trial-and-error.<br></li><li><strong>Re-Runs Are Painfully Frequent</strong>: Each adjustment requires full re-sampling, leading to hours or days of wasted computation just to test a single hypothesis.</li></ul><h3>Real-World Modeller’s Frustration</h3><p><em>"I had to pre-calculate coefficients using constrained OLS and feed them into Meridian as priors—otherwise, the Bayesian model would give me nonsense. Even then, it took weeks of tweaking before stakeholders accepted the results."</em></p><p>This workaround defeats the purpose of using a Bayesian framework—if you need OLS to guide your priors, why not just use OLS?</p><h2>Meta Robyn: Smarter in Theory, Lazier in Practice</h2><p>Meta Robyn uses evolutionary computing to optimize MMM, framing model selection as a "survival of the fittest" problem. While this sounds innovative, real-world usage reveals critical flaws:</p><h3>Evolutionary Computing is a Black Box</h3><ul><li><strong>No Mid-Process Adjustments</strong>: Once Robyn starts evolving models, you can’t tweak media contributions manually. You’re stuck waiting for generations of models to evolve—hoping one aligns with business expectations.<br></li><li><strong>Fitness Trade-Offs Hurt Practicality</strong>: Robyn optimizes for two conflicting objectives:<br><ul><li><strong>Model accuracy</strong> (minimizing data fitting error).<br></li><li><strong>Spend-to-impact alignment</strong> (ensuring media contribution shares match spend shares).<br></li><li><strong>Since these are competing goals, the final model is always a compromise—rarely satisfying marketers.</strong><br></li></ul></li></ul><h3>Adstock &amp; Diminishing Returns Tweaking is Back-and-forth</h3><ul><li><strong>Manual Parameter Overrides</strong>: If results are unrealistic, users must adjust Adstock decay rates or saturation curves and re-run the entire evolution—another time sink.<br></li><li><strong>No Guarantee of Improvement</strong>: Changing parameters doesn’t guarantee better outputs. Many users report running Robyn for weeks only to find none of the evolved models are usable.<br></li></ul><h3>Real-World Modeller’s Struggle</h3><p><em>"I spent weeks running Robyn, but the marketing team kept rejecting the outputs. The evolutionary algorithm doesn’t let me enforce business rules—it just ‘hopes’ a good model emerges. Most of the time, it doesn’t."</em></p><h2>The Common Failure: Lack of Control &amp; Efficiency</h2><p>Both tools share three critical shortcomings:</p><ul><li><strong>Blind Optimization:</strong><br><ul><li>Meridian relies on random MCMC walks, while Robyn uses evolutionary trial-and-error.<br></li><li>Neither allows direct intervention to enforce business logic mid-process.<br></li></ul></li><li><strong>Time-Consuming Re-Runs:</strong><br><ul><li>Every tweak requires full computation, leading to days or weeks of wasted effort.<br></li></ul></li><li><strong>Marketing-Unfriendly Outputs:</strong><br><ul><li>Bayesian and evolutionary methods prioritize statistical fit over realism.<br></li><li>Marketers need controllable, explainable models—not black-box approximations.</li></ul></li></ul><h2>A Better Way Forward</h2><p>Given these frustrations, what should MMM practitioners do?</p><h3>Hybrid Approaches (Pre-Optimization + Bayesian / Evolutionary)</h3><ul><li>Use constrained regression (OLS/LASSO) first to get reasonable priors before running Meridian.<br></li><li>Feed business-logic bounds into Robyn’s fitness function to reduce unrealistic outputs.</li></ul><h3>Custom Constraints &amp; Post-Hoc Adjustments</h3><ul><li>Enforce ROAS floors/ceilings and contribution sanity checks after model runs.<br></li><li>Manually override implausible coefficients when necessary (even if it breaks "pure" statistical rigor).</li></ul><h3>Alternative Tools with More Control</h3><ul><li>Reimplementing core algorithms with constrained sampling (e.g., Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with boundaries) can help.</li></ul><h2>Conclusion: The Need for Marketing-Centric MMM Tools</h2><p>Google Meridian and Meta Robyn are powerful in theory but inefficient in practice. Their lack of control, slow iterations, and unrealistic outputs make them frustrating for real-world MMM projects.</p><p>Until these tools introduce:</p><p><strong>✅ Real-time tuning during model runs</strong><br><strong>✅ Stricter business-logic enforcement</strong><br><strong>✅ Faster convergence with guided sampling</strong></p><p>MMM practitioners will continue to bleed time and sanity in the trenches of model tweaking.</p><p>The industry needs better solutions—ones that respect both statistics and marketing reality. Until then, modellers will keep resorting to manual hacks, workarounds, and hybrid approaches just to deliver usable results.</p>

Why Google Meridian and Meta Robyn Fall Short in Marketing Mix Modelling Tuning and Tweaking

<h2>Introduction</h2><p>Marketing Mix Modelling (MMM) remains a critical tool for quantifying the impact of media and non-media variables on sales. Google’s Meridian, an advanced Bayesian MMM solution, has gained traction for its scalability and integration with Google’s ecosystem. However, marketers often struggle with its limitations—particularly in calibration, efficiency, and alignment with business demands.</p><p>This article explores:</p><ul><li>Key shortcomings of Google Meridian<br></li><li>Why a constrained Bayesian approach outperforms traditional Bayesian methods<br></li><li>Real-world applications and success stories<br></li></ul><h2>The Problem with Google Meridian: Key Drawbacks</h2><p>While Google Meridian offers a powerful framework for MMM, several critical issues hinder its effectiveness in real-world marketing scenarios.</p><h3>Inflexible Media &amp; Non-Media Variable Adjustments</h3><p>Meridian relies heavily on prior distribution tweaking to align model outputs with marketer expectations. However, this process is:</p><ul><li><strong>Unpredictable</strong>: Small changes in priors can drastically alter other variables effect and modelling results.<br></li><li><strong>Time-Consuming</strong>: Requires multiple iterations to reach acceptable outputs.<br></li><li><strong>Inefficient</strong>: Struggles with large datasets (common in enterprise marketing).<br></li></ul><p><strong>Example</strong>: A FMCG brand spent weeks adjusting priors in Meridian, only to find that TV ad contributions were still overestimated, while digital channels were undervalued.</p><h3>Difficulty in Meeting Marketer Demands for Impact Share &amp; ROAS</h3><p>Marketers need precise control over:</p><ul><li>Media Impact Share (% contribution to sales)<br></li><li>Return on Ad Spend (ROAS)<br></li></ul><p>Google Meridian’s unconstrained Bayesian approach makes it difficult to enforce these business requirements. Without constraints, the model may produce unrealistic media effects (e.g., negative ROAS for high-performing channels).</p><h3>Forward-Thinking vs. Backward-Thinking Methodology</h3><ul><li><strong>Forward-Thinking (Meridian’s Approach):</strong><br><ul><li>Adjust priors → Run model → Check results → Repeat.<br></li><li>Highly iterative, slow, and inefficient.<br></li></ul></li><li><strong>Backward-Thinking (Constrained Bayesian Approach):</strong><br><ul><li>Start with desired ROAS/impact share → Apply constraints → Run model once.<br></li><li>Faster, more predictable, and aligned with business goals.</li></ul></li></ul><h3>Why Backward-Thinking Wins</h3><p>✅ Reduces rework (no endless tweaking of priors).<br>✅ Scales efficiently (handles 100+ variables seamlessly).<br>✅ Guarantees business-aligned outputs.</p><h3>Computational Inefficiency in MCMC Sampling</h3><p>Meridian uses Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for Bayesian regression, which:</p><ul><li>Involves random sampling, leading to slow convergence.<br></li><li>Lacks constraints, making results less controllable.<br></li></ul><p>For large datasets (e.g., 200+ media and marketing variables), this becomes computationally impractical.</p><h2>The Solution: Constrained Bayesian Regression</h2><p>To overcome these limitations, More Than Data developed a constrained Bayesian MMM framework that:</p><ul><li>Embeds business rules directly into the model.<br></li><li>Uses Gibbs Sampling (MCMC) with modified conditional distributions.<br></li><li>Ensures outputs align with marketer expectations.<br></li></ul><h2>How It Works</h2><h3>Applying Impact Share Constraints</h3><ul><li>Each media / non-media variable is assigned lower and upper bounds for its contribution.<br></li><li>Example:<br><ul><li>TV Ads: Must contribute 8-12% of total sales impact.<br></li><li>Competitor Discounts: Must have a negative impact (non-positive coefficient).</li></ul></li></ul><h3>Modified Gibbs Sampling for Efficient Convergence</h3><ul><li>Traditional MCMC: Random walks lead to unstable results.<br></li><li>Constrained Gibbs Sampling:<br><ul><li>Truncates distributions to enforce constraints (e.g., only positive coefficients for paid media).<br></li><li>Speeds up convergence by reducing the sampling space.<br></li></ul></li></ul><h3>Technical Advantage</h3><ul><li>If a paid ads must be non-negative, its conditional distribution is truncated to exclude negative values.<br></li><li>If competitor media must hurt sales, its coefficient sampling is forced to be non-positive.</li></ul><h3>Guaranteed Business-Aligned Outputs</h3><p>Unlike Meridian’s trial-and-error approach, this method:</p><p>✅ Delivers ROAS and impact shares within expected ranges.<br>✅ Eliminates unrealistic media effects (e.g., negative impact and negative ROAS).<br>✅ Scales to hundreds of variables without losing accuracy.</p><h2>Real-World Success: A Furniture Brand Case Study</h2><h3>Challenge</h3><p>A leading online &amp; in-store furniture brand needed to measure:</p><ul><li>174 media variables (ATL/BTL, full-funnel channels).<br></li><li>23 promotions (online/in-store).<br></li><li>48 product-level discounts.<br></li><li>12 bundled offers.<br></li><li>9 competitor campaigns<br></li><li>11 key seasonality factors (e.g. mid-year clearance sales)</li></ul><p>Google Meridian failed to handle this complexity, producing unstable and unrealistic results.</p><h3>Solution: More Than Data’s Constrained Bayesian MMM</h3><ul><li>Defined constraints for each variable (e.g., "Social ads must drive 4-6% of sales").<br></li><li>Applied Gibbs Sampling with truncated distributions.<br></li><li>Delivered actionable insights in days (vs. weeks with Meridian).</li></ul><h3>Results:</h3><p>✅ Identified top-performing channels (e.g., integrated TV + Social + Promotions Deliver 3x Returns vs. Single-Channel Ads).<br>✅ Quantified competitor impact (e.g., a rival’s 20% discount reduced sales by 12%).<br>✅ Optimized budget allocation, boosting marketing efficiency by 35%.</p><h3>Testimonial:&nbsp;</h3><p><em>"We struggled for months with Google Meridian—spending countless hours tweaking priors only to get unrealistic media contributions. More Than Data’s constrained Bayesian approach was a game-changer. Their model incorporated our business rules from the start, delivering reliable ROAS and impact shares in just one run. For the first time, we had a clear, actionable view of what was really driving sales. This isn’t just an upgrade to Meridian; it’s a fundamentally better way to do MMM."</em></p><h2>Conclusion: Why Constrained Bayesian MMM is the Future</h2><p>Google Meridian has limitations that make it unsuitable for enterprise MMM. By adopting a constrained Bayesian framework, marketers can:</p><p>✅ Eliminate guesswork with business-driven constraints.<br>✅ Speed up analysis (no more endless re-runs).<br>✅ Handle large datasets (100+ variables effortlessly).</p><p>For brands seeking accurate, scalable, and marketer-friendly MMM, the choice is clear: Ditch unconstrained models and embrace backward-thinking Bayesian methods.</p><h2>Ready to Upgrade Your MMM?</h2><p>If you’re tired of wrestling with Meridian’s limitations, More Than Data’s constrained Bayesian MMM delivers the precision and efficiency you need.</p><p>Contact us today for a <a data-mce-href="https://morethandata.biz/minute-mmm" href="https://morethandata.biz/minute-mmm" title="constrained Bayesian marketing mix modelling free consultation" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-mce-selected="inline-boundary"><strong>free consultation</strong></a>!</p>

Upgrading Google Meridian: A Constrained Bayesian Approach for Robust Marketing Mix Modelling

More Than Data

An Australia Sydney-based pioneer in marketing analytics, offering a free, fast, and user-friendly marketing mix modelling platform. We help marketers build actionable marketing mix models in under 10 minutes for instant insights. Our software Minute MMM is free, DIY, and simple—no costly consultants, complex tools, or data expertise needed. Optimize marketing investments with ease!

Mulish

Sora

Merriweather

<p><strong>This website delivers the media measurement &amp; budget optimization tools that big MMM providers charge premium prices for—only now, they're free.</strong></p>

Blog

The Great MMM Expectation Gap: Why Marketers Get Frustrat...

The Hidden Secrets of Marketing Mix Modeling Service Prov...

Mastering Marketing Analytics Without Breaking the Bank

Instant Insights: How Our Free Marketing Mix Platform Tra...

Why Google Meridian and Meta Robyn Fall Short in Marketin...

Upgrading Google Meridian: A Constrained Bayesian Approac...