Blog

<h2>Introduction: The Wizardry Behind the Curtain</h2><p>Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM) is often treated like the oracle of marketing analytics—a mystical tool that reveals the truth about which ads work, where budgets should go, and how to maximize ROAS. Companies pour millions into MMM studies, trusting the outputs to guide billion-dollar decisions.</p><p>But what if the oracle isn’t as infallible as it seems?</p><p>Behind the polished reports and confident recommendations, there’s a world of statistical wizardry, clever workarounds, and a few… let’s call them optimizations that vendors don’t always advertise.</p><p>This isn’t an exposé meant to vilify MMM providers—after all, the technique remains one of the most robust ways to measure marketing effectiveness. Instead, think of this as a backstage pass—revealing the tricks of the trade so marketers can ask better questions, demand more transparency, and ultimately get more value from their MMM investments.</p><p>By the end of this deep dive, you’ll understand:</p><p>✅ The subtle (and sometimes sneaky) ways MMM models are "tuned" to look better than they are</p><p>✅ Why transparency is still a major hurdle in MMM adoption<br></p><p>✅ How open-source tools are changing the game (but still have big limitations)<br></p><p>✅ What marketers should demand from MMM vendors to avoid misleading results</p><p>Let’s pull back the curtain.</p><h2>Chapter 1: The Illusion of Perfect Fit – How Dummy Variables Mask Reality</h2><h3>The Problem: Models Need to Explain the Past</h3><p>At its core, MMM is a regression-based analysis that connects marketing inputs (ad spend, promotions, pricing) to business outcomes (sales, conversions, revenue). The goal? Find the mathematical relationship that best explains historical performance.</p><p>But here’s the catch: Real-world data is messy.</p><ul><li>Random demand spikes (unrelated to marketing)<br></li><li>External shocks (e.g., a competitor’s blunder)<br></li><li>Data collection errors</li></ul><p>A truly "perfect" model would account for all these anomalies. But since that’s impossible, MMM practitioners use dummy variables—special binary flags that "explain" unexpected deviations.</p><h3>The Secret: Some Dummy Variables Are… Made Up</h3><p>In an ideal world, dummy variables are only used when:</p><ul><li>A major one-time event occurred (e.g., a PR crisis)<br></li><li>A data error is confirmed (e.g., tracking failure)</li></ul><p>But in reality? Many models overuse dummies to force a better fit.</p><ul><li>No clear reason for a sales spike? "Let’s add a dummy."<br></li><li>Model residuals look too erratic? "Maybe a few more dummies will smooth things out."</li></ul><h3>Why does this happen?</h3><ul><li>Clients love clean models. A low error margin feels more "scientific."<br></li><li>It’s hard to prove a dummy is unjustified. ("Maybe there was a local event we don’t know about?")<br></li><li>No one audits the model’s internals. Most clients just see the final output.</li></ul><h3>The Risk: Overfitting Leads to Misleading Explanations</h3><p>A model that fits historical data too perfectly may not actually explain the true drivers of performance. Instead, it memorizes noise—random fluctuations, one-off events, or data quirks—and mistakes them for real patterns.</p><h3>How to spot this?</h3><ul><li>Request dummy variable documentation (what events do they represent?)<br></li><li>Validate against buinsess intuition (If the model claims promotions drove 60% of sales, ask: "when did these promotions run, what type were they, and how do they align with our actual campaign data?")<br></li></ul><h2>Chapter 2: The "Random Noise" Trick – Gaming Statistical Tests</h2><h3>The Problem: Models Must Pass Diagnostic Checks</h3><p>For an MMM model to be statistically valid, it must pass several tests:</p><p>✅ Residual normality (errors should follow a bell curve)<br>✅ Homoscedasticity (errors should have constant variance)<br>✅ No autocorrelation (errors shouldn’t be linked over time)</p><p>If the model fails these, clients (rightfully) get skeptical.</p><h3>The Secret: Some Models Cheat with Random Noise</h3><p>When residuals fail tests, some modellers add random variables—tiny, meaningless fluctuations—to make the errors appear more random.</p><h3>How it works:</h3><ul><li>The model initially fails a test (e.g., residuals are skewed).<br></li><li>The modeller injects artificial random white noise.<br></li><li>Suddenly, the residuals look "perfect."</li></ul><h3>Why does this happen?</h3><ul><li>Clients rarely check diagnostics. They focus on ROI numbers.<br></li><li>Failing tests can delay projects. Tweaking residuals speeds up delivery.</li></ul><h3>The Risk: False Confidence in Flawed Models</h3><p>A model that "passes" tests artificially may still give bad recommendations.</p><h3>How to protect yourself:</h3><ul><li>Ask for pre- and post-adjustment diagnostics<br></li><li>Require transparency on all model inputs</li></ul><h2>Chapter 3: The Black Box of Adstock &amp; Diminishing Returns</h2><h3>The Problem: Media Effects Aren’t Linear</h3><p>A dollar spent on TV doesn’t have the same impact as a dollar on Facebook. MMM accounts for this using:</p><ul><li>Adstock: How long an ad’s effect lingers (e.g., TV ads decay slower)<br></li><li>Diminishing returns: The point where extra spending stops working</li></ul><h3>The Secret: Parameters Are Often Arbitrary</h3><p>The formulas for these transformations rely on hidden parameters—numbers like:</p><ul><li>Decay rates (How fast does TV impact fade?)<br></li><li>Saturation points (When does Facebook stop working?)</li></ul><h3>The issue? Many vendors:</h3><ul><li>Don’t disclose how they set these values<br></li><li>Over-tune them to reduce collinearity (making the model look cleaner)</li></ul><h3>Why does this happen?</h3><ul><li>Clients rarely ask. They assume it’s "science."<br></li><li>It’s easier than finding true causality.</li></ul><h3>The Risk: Misguided Budget Allocations</h3><p>If Adstock rates are wrong, the model may overvalue long-tail channels (e.g., TV) and undervalue short-term ones (e.g., search ads).</p><h3>How to fight back:</h3><ul><li>Demand sensitivity analysis (show how results change with different parameters)<br></li><li>Compare against experimental data (e.g., geo lift tests)<br></li></ul><h2>Chapter 4: The Transparency Dilemma – Who’s Really Running the Show?</h2><h3>The Problem: Most MMM Is a Black Box</h3><p>Clients send data to vendors and get back insights. But what happens in between?</p><h3>The Three MMM Business Models</h3><table style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%;" border="1" data-mce-style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%;" data-mce-selected="1"><tbody><tr><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;"><em><strong>Type</strong></em></td><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;"><em><strong>How It Works</strong></em></td><td style="width: 33.335%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.335%;"><em><strong>Transparency Level</strong></em></td></tr><tr><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;"><em><strong>Traditional Consulting</strong></em></td><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;">Human modellers tweak data behind the scenes</td><td style="width: 33.335%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.335%;">❌ Low (you see only final outputs)</td></tr><tr><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;"><em><strong>SaaS MMM</strong></em></td><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;">Data scientists execute the modeling process in the backend, with final results surfaced in the dashboard interface</td><td style="width: 33.335%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.335%;">⚠️ Medium (but who checks the backend work?)</td></tr><tr><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;"><em><strong>Open-source MMM (e.g., Google Meridian, Meta Robyn)</strong></em></td><td style="width: 33.3325%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.3325%;">Marketers build models themselves</td><td style="width: 33.335%;" data-mce-style="width: 33.335%;">✅ High (but requires coding skills)</td></tr></tbody></table><h3>The Secret: Even SaaS Tools Have Hidden Tweaks</h3><p>Many SaaS platforms claim transparency but:</p><ul><li>Pre-process data in opaque ways<br></li><li>Apply hidden business rules (e.g., capping unrealistic coefficients)</li></ul><h3>Why does this happen?</h3><ul><li>Fully transparent models often look "ugly." Clients prefer clean stories.<br></li><li>SaaS automation requires assumptions. Vendors don’t always disclose them.</li></ul><h3>The Risk: Blind Trust in Black Boxes</h3><p>Without visibility, clients can’t audit recommendations.</p><h3>How to demand better:</h3><ul><li>Ask for raw model outputs (not just dashboards)<br></li><li>Require documentation on all automated adjustments</li></ul><h2>Chapter 5: The Future of MMM – More Automation, Less Wizardry</h2><h3>The Good News: Tech Is Making MMM Faster &amp; Cheaper</h3><ul><li>Open-source tools (Meridian, Robyn) reduce vendor lock-in.<br></li><li>Automated data pipelines cut manual work.<br></li><li>Real-time MMM is emerging (no more annual reports).</li></ul><h3>The Bad News: The Core Challenges Remain</h3><ul><li>Small businesses still can’t afford good MMM.<br></li><li>Non-technical marketers struggle with open-source tools.<br></li><li>Vendors still control too much opacity.</li></ul><h3>What Marketers Should Do Next</h3><ul><li>Ask harder questions (How are Adstock rates set? Can I see residuals?)<br></li><li>Combine MMM with experiments (e.g., geo tests for validation)<br></li><li>Push for SaaS tools with full transparency</li></ul><h2>Conclusion: MMM Is Powerful—But Demand Transparency</h2><p>Marketing Mix Modeling isn’t going away. Despite its flaws, it remains one of the best ways to connect marketing spend to business outcomes.</p><p>But like any powerful tool, it can be misused—intentionally or not.</p><h3>The solution?</h3><ul><li>Treat MMM as a guide, not gospel.<br></li><li>Demand full transparency from vendors.</li><li>Combine it with other measurement methods.</li></ul><p>The best MMM providers aren’t the ones with the flashiest models. </p><p>They’re the ones who show their work—dummy variables, Adstock assumptions, and all.</p><p><strong>So next time you get an MMM report, ask:</strong></p><p><strong><em>"How much of this is science… and how much is statistical storytelling?"</em></strong></p><p><em>Disclaimer: No MMM vendors were harmed in the making of this article. (But a few may be nervously double-checking their dummy variables.)</em></p>

The Hidden Secrets of Marketing Mix Modeling Service Providers They’d Rather Keep Quiet

<h2>Understanding the Basics of Marketing Analytics</h2>
<p>Marketing analytics can seem daunting, especially for small businesses with limited budgets. However, understanding the basics is the first step towards mastering it without overspending. At its core, marketing analytics involves collecting and analyzing data to understand customer behaviors and optimize marketing strategies. By leveraging the right tools and techniques, businesses can gain valuable insights and make data-driven decisions.</p>

<p>Investing in marketing analytics doesn't have to mean high costs. There are numerous affordable tools available that offer comprehensive analytics solutions. These tools can help track website traffic, measure campaign performance, and understand customer engagement.</p>

<figure id="figure-p0tuj9suhkm9scupg1"><img id="p0tuj9suhkm9scupg1" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/1954841243/photo/data-analysis-chart-graph-3d-statistics-background.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=JqlWDrRuqpKotSJiWlw9XEKfqmlar9qw3g5TGMGWdVk=" alt="marketing analytics tools" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<h2>Utilizing Free and Low-Cost Tools</h2>
<p>Free tools like Google Analytics are a great starting point for businesses looking to dive into marketing analytics without spending a fortune. Google Analytics provides insights into user behavior, traffic sources, and conversion rates, helping businesses understand how well their marketing efforts are performing.</p>

<p>Additionally, platforms such as Facebook Insights and Twitter Analytics offer valuable data on social media engagement. These tools are free to use and can help businesses monitor their social media performance and adjust strategies accordingly.</p>

<h2>Leveraging Data for Better Decision-Making</h2>
<p>Once you have the tools in place, it's crucial to know how to use the data effectively. Data-driven decision-making is about using insights from analytics to guide your marketing strategies. For instance, understanding peak traffic times or the most engaging types of content can help in scheduling posts and creating more targeted campaigns.</p>

<p>Regularly reviewing analytics reports ensures that you stay on top of trends and make informed decisions. This approach not only helps in maximizing marketing efforts but also in aligning them with business goals.</p>

<figure id="figure-ihu4r76kijm9scupg1"><img id="ihu4r76kijm9scupg1" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/2166193838/photo/a-man-reviews-the-data-analysis-of-marketing-from-social-media-platforms.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=bp1wg81DHuHMul6h4DuLYX_KcWxvhqMUGmcjpNBQ6eI=" alt="data driven decisions" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<h2>Building an Analytics-Focused Culture</h2>
<p>Creating an analytics-focused culture within your organization can enhance the effectiveness of your marketing strategies. Encourage team members to embrace data-driven decisions and provide training on using analytics tools effectively. This will empower your team to contribute to marketing success actively.</p>

<p>Moreover, promoting a culture that values data can lead to more innovative solutions and a greater understanding of customer needs. This cultural shift often results in more strategic and efficient marketing efforts.</p>

<h2>Monitoring Performance and Adjusting Strategies</h2>
<p>An essential part of mastering marketing analytics is regularly monitoring performance and adjusting strategies as necessary. Set clear KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) to measure success and identify areas for improvement.</p>

<p>Creating a feedback loop where you continuously analyze outcomes and tweak strategies ensures that your marketing remains agile and responsive to changes in the market.</p>

<figure id="figure-gxrt5orbnim9scupg1"><img id="gxrt5orbnim9scupg1" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/2101122136/photo/woman-hand-holding-tv-remote.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=ddxB5uLrJZA1Ru8MnZjWf9BRdo6vmFkb7EjnXDWLdrs=" alt="performance monitoring" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<h2>Conclusion: Making Analytics Work for You</h2>
<p>By focusing on affordable tools, leveraging data for decision-making, fostering an analytics-centric culture, and continuously monitoring performance, businesses can master marketing analytics without breaking the bank. The key is to start simple, gradually build your capabilities, and always keep your business objectives in mind.</p>

<p>With a strategic approach, even small businesses can harness the power of marketing analytics to drive growth and stay competitive in today's dynamic market landscape.</p>

Mastering Marketing Analytics Without Breaking the Bank

<h2>Unlocking the Power of a Free Marketing Mix Platform</h2>
<p>In today's fast-paced digital landscape, businesses must stay agile and responsive to ever-changing consumer demands. A well-defined marketing strategy is crucial, but with so many tools and platforms available, it can be overwhelming to select the right mix. That's where our free marketing mix platform comes into play, offering instant insights that can transform your strategy.</p>

<figure id="figure-2ga97juj6qm9o2j26d"><img id="2ga97juj6qm9o2j26d" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/629303228/photo/im-happy-to-explain.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=WEmzS8V0sMIhn9i-_wyF5Cs9Iyk4Ye2AfzGK4jmkLt4=" alt="marketing strategy" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<h3>The Importance of a Balanced Marketing Mix</h3>
<p>The term "marketing mix" refers to the set of actions or tactics a company uses to promote its brand or product in the market. Traditionally, this includes the four Ps: Product, Price, Place, and Promotion. However, in the digital age, this concept has expanded to include People, Process, and Physical evidence. A balanced marketing mix ensures that all aspects of your marketing strategy work in harmony to achieve your business goals.</p>

<p>With our platform, you can easily analyze and adjust these components to better suit your target audience. By doing so, you're not only improving brand visibility but also enhancing customer satisfaction and loyalty.</p>

<h3>Instant Insights for Informed Decision-Making</h3>
<p>One of the standout features of our platform is the ability to provide instant insights. These insights are crucial for making informed decisions quickly and efficiently. With real-time data at your fingertips, you can identify trends, track performance metrics, and adjust your strategy on the fly. This agility is key in maintaining a competitive edge in today's dynamic market.</p>

<figure id="figure-0wb8uwdul7m9o2j26d"><img id="0wb8uwdul7m9o2j26d" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/2157709105/photo/data-fabric-ai-artificial-intelligence-powered-analytics-data-data-verse-big-data-data.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=gYImeeQslIntNzWrO8iIyRALiovJOudFMtQ4GEeUQm8=" alt="data analytics" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<p>Our platform's intuitive dashboard allows you to visualize data through easy-to-understand charts and graphs. This visual representation helps you grasp complex information effortlessly, enabling you to focus on strategic planning rather than getting bogged down by data analysis.</p>

<h3>Comprehensive Tools for Enhanced Performance</h3>
<p>Beyond insights, our platform offers a suite of comprehensive tools designed to enhance your marketing performance. From campaign management to customer segmentation and beyond, these tools streamline your marketing efforts and ensure that every dollar spent is maximized for return on investment.</p>

<ul>
  <li><b>Campaign Management:</b> Plan, execute, and track campaigns across multiple channels with ease.</li>
  <li><b>Customer Segmentation:</b> Tailor your messages to specific audience segments for more personalized communication.</li>
  <li><b>Performance Analytics:</b> Monitor key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure success and identify areas for improvement.</li>
</ul>

<h3>Free Access to Transform Your Strategy</h3>
<p>The best part? Our platform is completely free to use. We believe that every business, regardless of size or budget, should have access to the tools necessary to succeed. By offering this platform at no cost, we aim to democratize access to powerful marketing insights and tools.</p>

<figure id="figure-ebb7xn0l7om9o2j26d"><img id="ebb7xn0l7om9o2j26d" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/1887449067/photo/confident-businessman-in-modern-office.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=t7lPpv8khkhF5ZXW1w5wQLekaIqG_8Tb_LJ87_mFLz0=" alt="business growth" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<p>Whether you're a small startup or an established enterprise, our free marketing mix platform empowers you to refine your strategy and drive results. Don't let budget constraints hinder your growth—leverage our platform's capabilities today and see the transformation for yourself.</p>

<h3>Conclusion: Embrace the Future of Marketing</h3>
<p>The future of marketing is data-driven and customer-centric. By utilizing our free marketing mix platform, you position your business at the forefront of this evolution. Gain instant insights, make informed decisions, and unlock new levels of success in your marketing endeavors. Embrace the future with confidence and transform your strategy like never before.</p>

Instant Insights: How Our Free Marketing Mix Platform Transforms Your Strategy

<h2>Introduction</h2><p>Marketing Mix Modelling (MMM) remains a cornerstone of marketing analytics, helping brands measure the effectiveness of their campaigns and optimize budgets. However, the process of tuning and refining MMM models is notoriously complex, requiring deep statistical expertise and patience.</p><p>Two of the most prominent open-source MMM tools—Google Meridian (a Bayesian MMM framework) and Meta Robyn (an evolutionary computing-based MMM solution)—promise to simplify this process. Yet, in practice, both tools suffer from inefficiencies, uncontrollable tuning mechanisms, and time-consuming iterations that frustrate data scientists and marketers alike.</p><p>In this article, we’ll dissect why these tools fail to deliver a smooth MMM tuning experience, the technical and practical challenges they introduce, and how real-world users struggle with them.</p><h2>The Problem with Google Meridian: A Bayesian Nightmare</h2><p>Google Meridian adopts a Bayesian approach to MMM, leveraging Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling to estimate media effects. While Bayesian methods offer flexibility, Meridian’s implementation introduces several pain points:</p><h3>Prior Distribution Tweaking is Inefficient and Unpredictable</h3><ul><li><strong>"Spray and Pray" Methodology</strong>: Adjusting prior distributions (e.g., for media coefficients) feels like a blind optimization process. There’s no clear guidance on how changes will impact the final model.<br></li><li><strong>Unstable Adjustments</strong>: Modifying one prior often unexpectedly shifts other variables, destabilizing the model. Without constraints, coefficients can drift into unrealistic ranges (e.g., negative ROAS for TV ads).<br></li><li><strong>No Guarantee of Marketing-Friendly Outputs</strong>: Bayesian models prioritize statistical fit over business logic. Marketers expect ROAS and contribution shares to align with spend—but Meridian often produces counterintuitive results that require manual overrides.<br></li></ul><h3>MCMC is Slow and Uncontrollable</h3><ul><li><strong>Random Sampling ≠ Controlled Optimization</strong>: MCMC explores parameter space randomly, meaning convergence is slow—especially with large datasets.<br></li><li><strong>No Constraints on Realism</strong>: Unrestricted sampling can yield implausible coefficients (e.g., a tiny digital ad spend driving massive sales). Users must manually enforce constraints (e.g., via half-normal priors), but this is trial-and-error.<br></li><li><strong>Re-Runs Are Painfully Frequent</strong>: Each adjustment requires full re-sampling, leading to hours or days of wasted computation just to test a single hypothesis.</li></ul><h3>Real-World Modeller’s Frustration</h3><p><em>"I had to pre-calculate coefficients using constrained OLS and feed them into Meridian as priors—otherwise, the Bayesian model would give me nonsense. Even then, it took weeks of tweaking before stakeholders accepted the results."</em></p><p>This workaround defeats the purpose of using a Bayesian framework—if you need OLS to guide your priors, why not just use OLS?</p><h2>Meta Robyn: Smarter in Theory, Lazier in Practice</h2><p>Meta Robyn uses evolutionary computing to optimize MMM, framing model selection as a "survival of the fittest" problem. While this sounds innovative, real-world usage reveals critical flaws:</p><h3>Evolutionary Computing is a Black Box</h3><ul><li><strong>No Mid-Process Adjustments</strong>: Once Robyn starts evolving models, you can’t tweak media contributions manually. You’re stuck waiting for generations of models to evolve—hoping one aligns with business expectations.<br></li><li><strong>Fitness Trade-Offs Hurt Practicality</strong>: Robyn optimizes for two conflicting objectives:<br><ul><li><strong>Model accuracy</strong> (minimizing data fitting error).<br></li><li><strong>Spend-to-impact alignment</strong> (ensuring media contribution shares match spend shares).<br></li><li><strong>Since these are competing goals, the final model is always a compromise—rarely satisfying marketers.</strong><br></li></ul></li></ul><h3>Adstock &amp; Diminishing Returns Tweaking is Back-and-forth</h3><ul><li><strong>Manual Parameter Overrides</strong>: If results are unrealistic, users must adjust Adstock decay rates or saturation curves and re-run the entire evolution—another time sink.<br></li><li><strong>No Guarantee of Improvement</strong>: Changing parameters doesn’t guarantee better outputs. Many users report running Robyn for weeks only to find none of the evolved models are usable.<br></li></ul><h3>Real-World Modeller’s Struggle</h3><p><em>"I spent weeks running Robyn, but the marketing team kept rejecting the outputs. The evolutionary algorithm doesn’t let me enforce business rules—it just ‘hopes’ a good model emerges. Most of the time, it doesn’t."</em></p><h2>The Common Failure: Lack of Control &amp; Efficiency</h2><p>Both tools share three critical shortcomings:</p><ul><li><strong>Blind Optimization:</strong><br><ul><li>Meridian relies on random MCMC walks, while Robyn uses evolutionary trial-and-error.<br></li><li>Neither allows direct intervention to enforce business logic mid-process.<br></li></ul></li><li><strong>Time-Consuming Re-Runs:</strong><br><ul><li>Every tweak requires full computation, leading to days or weeks of wasted effort.<br></li></ul></li><li><strong>Marketing-Unfriendly Outputs:</strong><br><ul><li>Bayesian and evolutionary methods prioritize statistical fit over realism.<br></li><li>Marketers need controllable, explainable models—not black-box approximations.</li></ul></li></ul><h2>A Better Way Forward</h2><p>Given these frustrations, what should MMM practitioners do?</p><h3>Hybrid Approaches (Pre-Optimization + Bayesian / Evolutionary)</h3><ul><li>Use constrained regression (OLS/LASSO) first to get reasonable priors before running Meridian.<br></li><li>Feed business-logic bounds into Robyn’s fitness function to reduce unrealistic outputs.</li></ul><h3>Custom Constraints &amp; Post-Hoc Adjustments</h3><ul><li>Enforce ROAS floors/ceilings and contribution sanity checks after model runs.<br></li><li>Manually override implausible coefficients when necessary (even if it breaks "pure" statistical rigor).</li></ul><h3>Alternative Tools with More Control</h3><ul><li>Reimplementing core algorithms with constrained sampling (e.g., Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with boundaries) can help.</li></ul><h2>Conclusion: The Need for Marketing-Centric MMM Tools</h2><p>Google Meridian and Meta Robyn are powerful in theory but inefficient in practice. Their lack of control, slow iterations, and unrealistic outputs make them frustrating for real-world MMM projects.</p><p>Until these tools introduce:</p><p><strong>✅ Real-time tuning during model runs</strong><br><strong>✅ Stricter business-logic enforcement</strong><br><strong>✅ Faster convergence with guided sampling</strong></p><p>MMM practitioners will continue to bleed time and sanity in the trenches of model tweaking.</p><p>The industry needs better solutions—ones that respect both statistics and marketing reality. Until then, modellers will keep resorting to manual hacks, workarounds, and hybrid approaches just to deliver usable results.</p>

Why Google Meridian and Meta Robyn Fall Short in Marketing Mix Modelling Tuning and Tweaking

<h2>Introduction</h2><p>Marketing Mix Modelling (MMM) remains a critical tool for quantifying the impact of media and non-media variables on sales. Google’s Meridian, an advanced Bayesian MMM solution, has gained traction for its scalability and integration with Google’s ecosystem. However, marketers often struggle with its limitations—particularly in calibration, efficiency, and alignment with business demands.</p><p>This article explores:</p><ul><li>Key shortcomings of Google Meridian<br></li><li>Why a constrained Bayesian approach outperforms traditional Bayesian methods<br></li><li>Real-world applications and success stories<br></li></ul><h2>The Problem with Google Meridian: Key Drawbacks</h2><p>While Google Meridian offers a powerful framework for MMM, several critical issues hinder its effectiveness in real-world marketing scenarios.</p><h3>Inflexible Media &amp; Non-Media Variable Adjustments</h3><p>Meridian relies heavily on prior distribution tweaking to align model outputs with marketer expectations. However, this process is:</p><ul><li><strong>Unpredictable</strong>: Small changes in priors can drastically alter other variables effect and modelling results.<br></li><li><strong>Time-Consuming</strong>: Requires multiple iterations to reach acceptable outputs.<br></li><li><strong>Inefficient</strong>: Struggles with large datasets (common in enterprise marketing).<br></li></ul><p><strong>Example</strong>: A FMCG brand spent weeks adjusting priors in Meridian, only to find that TV ad contributions were still overestimated, while digital channels were undervalued.</p><h3>Difficulty in Meeting Marketer Demands for Impact Share &amp; ROAS</h3><p>Marketers need precise control over:</p><ul><li>Media Impact Share (% contribution to sales)<br></li><li>Return on Ad Spend (ROAS)<br></li></ul><p>Google Meridian’s unconstrained Bayesian approach makes it difficult to enforce these business requirements. Without constraints, the model may produce unrealistic media effects (e.g., negative ROAS for high-performing channels).</p><h3>Forward-Thinking vs. Backward-Thinking Methodology</h3><ul><li><strong>Forward-Thinking (Meridian’s Approach):</strong><br><ul><li>Adjust priors → Run model → Check results → Repeat.<br></li><li>Highly iterative, slow, and inefficient.<br></li></ul></li><li><strong>Backward-Thinking (Constrained Bayesian Approach):</strong><br><ul><li>Start with desired ROAS/impact share → Apply constraints → Run model once.<br></li><li>Faster, more predictable, and aligned with business goals.</li></ul></li></ul><h3>Why Backward-Thinking Wins</h3><p>✅ Reduces rework (no endless tweaking of priors).<br>✅ Scales efficiently (handles 100+ variables seamlessly).<br>✅ Guarantees business-aligned outputs.</p><h3>Computational Inefficiency in MCMC Sampling</h3><p>Meridian uses Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for Bayesian regression, which:</p><ul><li>Involves random sampling, leading to slow convergence.<br></li><li>Lacks constraints, making results less controllable.<br></li></ul><p>For large datasets (e.g., 200+ media and marketing variables), this becomes computationally impractical.</p><h2>The Solution: Constrained Bayesian Regression</h2><p>To overcome these limitations, More Than Data developed a constrained Bayesian MMM framework that:</p><ul><li>Embeds business rules directly into the model.<br></li><li>Uses Gibbs Sampling (MCMC) with modified conditional distributions.<br></li><li>Ensures outputs align with marketer expectations.<br></li></ul><h2>How It Works</h2><h3>Applying Impact Share Constraints</h3><ul><li>Each media / non-media variable is assigned lower and upper bounds for its contribution.<br></li><li>Example:<br><ul><li>TV Ads: Must contribute 8-12% of total sales impact.<br></li><li>Competitor Discounts: Must have a negative impact (non-positive coefficient).</li></ul></li></ul><h3>Modified Gibbs Sampling for Efficient Convergence</h3><ul><li>Traditional MCMC: Random walks lead to unstable results.<br></li><li>Constrained Gibbs Sampling:<br><ul><li>Truncates distributions to enforce constraints (e.g., only positive coefficients for paid media).<br></li><li>Speeds up convergence by reducing the sampling space.<br></li></ul></li></ul><h3>Technical Advantage</h3><ul><li>If a paid ads must be non-negative, its conditional distribution is truncated to exclude negative values.<br></li><li>If competitor media must hurt sales, its coefficient sampling is forced to be non-positive.</li></ul><h3>Guaranteed Business-Aligned Outputs</h3><p>Unlike Meridian’s trial-and-error approach, this method:</p><p>✅ Delivers ROAS and impact shares within expected ranges.<br>✅ Eliminates unrealistic media effects (e.g., negative impact and negative ROAS).<br>✅ Scales to hundreds of variables without losing accuracy.</p><h2>Real-World Success: A Furniture Brand Case Study</h2><h3>Challenge</h3><p>A leading online &amp; in-store furniture brand needed to measure:</p><ul><li>174 media variables (ATL/BTL, full-funnel channels).<br></li><li>23 promotions (online/in-store).<br></li><li>48 product-level discounts.<br></li><li>12 bundled offers.<br></li><li>9 competitor campaigns<br></li><li>11 key seasonality factors (e.g. mid-year clearance sales)</li></ul><p>Google Meridian failed to handle this complexity, producing unstable and unrealistic results.</p><h3>Solution: More Than Data’s Constrained Bayesian MMM</h3><ul><li>Defined constraints for each variable (e.g., "Social ads must drive 4-6% of sales").<br></li><li>Applied Gibbs Sampling with truncated distributions.<br></li><li>Delivered actionable insights in days (vs. weeks with Meridian).</li></ul><h3>Results:</h3><p>✅ Identified top-performing channels (e.g., integrated TV + Social + Promotions Deliver 3x Returns vs. Single-Channel Ads).<br>✅ Quantified competitor impact (e.g., a rival’s 20% discount reduced sales by 12%).<br>✅ Optimized budget allocation, boosting marketing efficiency by 35%.</p><h3>Testimonial:&nbsp;</h3><p><em>"We struggled for months with Google Meridian—spending countless hours tweaking priors only to get unrealistic media contributions. More Than Data’s constrained Bayesian approach was a game-changer. Their model incorporated our business rules from the start, delivering reliable ROAS and impact shares in just one run. For the first time, we had a clear, actionable view of what was really driving sales. This isn’t just an upgrade to Meridian; it’s a fundamentally better way to do MMM."</em></p><h2>Conclusion: Why Constrained Bayesian MMM is the Future</h2><p>Google Meridian has limitations that make it unsuitable for enterprise MMM. By adopting a constrained Bayesian framework, marketers can:</p><p>✅ Eliminate guesswork with business-driven constraints.<br>✅ Speed up analysis (no more endless re-runs).<br>✅ Handle large datasets (100+ variables effortlessly).</p><p>For brands seeking accurate, scalable, and marketer-friendly MMM, the choice is clear: Ditch unconstrained models and embrace backward-thinking Bayesian methods.</p><h2>Ready to Upgrade Your MMM?</h2><p>If you’re tired of wrestling with Meridian’s limitations, More Than Data’s constrained Bayesian MMM delivers the precision and efficiency you need.</p><p>Contact us today for a <a data-mce-href="https://morethandata.biz/minute-mmm" href="https://morethandata.biz/minute-mmm" title="constrained Bayesian marketing mix modelling free consultation" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-mce-selected="inline-boundary"><strong>free consultation</strong></a>!</p>

Upgrading Google Meridian: A Constrained Bayesian Approach for Robust Marketing Mix Modelling

<h2>Introduction</h2><p>Influencer marketing has become a cornerstone of modern digital strategies, with brands investing heavily in collaborations to boost visibility, engagement, and sales. However, many businesses fail to measure the real impact of these campaigns, treating them as a "spray and pray" tactic rather than a performance-driven investment.</p><p>Without proper measurement, you risk:</p><ul><li>Wasting budget on ineffective influencers<br></li><li>Missing opportunities to optimize campaigns<br></li><li>Failing to justify future investments</li></ul><p>This article will guide you through a structured approach to measuring influencer marketing ROI, using real-world examples and proven methodologies.</p><h2>Why You Must Measure Influencer Marketing</h2><p>Many marketers assume that influencer success is purely based on engagement rates or follower counts. However, vanity metrics alone don’t translate to sales. Here’s why measurement is non-negotiable:</p><h3>Influencer Marketing is Performance Marketing</h3><p>Just like paid ads, influencer campaigns should be tied to business outcomes—whether it’s sales, leads, or brand lift. If you can’t track ROI, you’re essentially gambling with your marketing budget.</p><p><strong>Example</strong>: A DTC skincare brand invested $50,000 in micro-influencers but saw no sales lift. Upon analysing, they discovered that while engagement was high, the influencers’ audiences didn’t align with their target demographic. Without tracking conversions, they wasted resources.</p><h3>Justify Future Investments</h3><p>Not all influencers deliver equal value. Measuring performance helps you:</p><ul><li>Identify top-performing creators<br></li><li>Optimize budget allocation<br></li><li>Discontinue partnerships that don’t drive results</li></ul><p><strong>Example</strong>: A fashion retailer worked with 10 influencers but only three generated measurable sales. By reallocating budget to the best performers, they increased ROI by 40% in the next campaign.</p><h2>Avoid Vanity Metrics – They’re Misleading</h2><p>Vanity metrics (likes, shares, impressions) might look impressive, but they don’t guarantee sales. Worse, they can be manipulated.</p><h3>The Problem with Vanity Metrics</h3><ul><li><strong>Fake Engagement</strong>: Some agencies use bots or click farms to inflate numbers.<br></li><li><strong>No Direct Sales Correlation</strong>: High impressions don’t always mean high conversions.</li></ul><h3>Real-World Case</h3><p>A TikTok influencer agency was caught using hundreds of devices to artificially boost live-stream engagement. The campaign showed 200K+ views, but actual sales were near zero.</p><h3>What to Track Instead</h3><ul><li><strong>Conversion Rate</strong> (% of viewers who purchase)<br></li><li><strong>Click-Through Rate (CTR)</strong> (traffic driven to your site)<br></li><li><strong>Cost Per Acquisition (CPA)</strong> (how much you spend to gain a customer)<br></li><li><strong>Attributable Sales</strong> (direct purchases from promo codes or tracked links)</li></ul><h2>Step 1: Set Up Proper Tracking Before Launching Campaigns</h2><p>Without accurate tracking, you’ll never know which influencers drive sales.</p><h3>Key Tracking Methods</h3><p><strong>1. Unique Promo Codes &amp; Affiliate Links</strong></p><ul><li>Assign each influencer a unique discount code or affiliate link.<br></li><li>Track redemptions in your e-commerce platform.<br></li></ul><p><strong>Example</strong>: A flower e-commerce brand failed to link promo codes to specific influencers, making it impossible to measure which partnerships were profitable. After fixing this, they identified that 70% of sales came from just two influencers.</p><p><strong>2. UTM Parameters &amp; Google Analytics</strong></p><ul><li>Embed UTM tags in influencer-shared URLs (e.g., ?utm_source=Instagram&amp;utm_medium=InfluencerX).<br></li><li>Monitor traffic sources in Google Analytics.<br></li></ul><p><strong>Best Practice</strong>: Use consistent naming conventions (e.g., Campaign=SummerSale_InfluencerY). Track not just clicks but also on-site behaviour (lead form submission, cart additions).</p><p><strong>3. Conversion API (CAPI) for Reliable Tracking</strong></p><ul><li>Traditional pixel tracking is limited due to cookie restrictions.<br></li><li>CAPI uses server-side tracking for more accurate data.<br></li></ul><p><strong>Example</strong>: A beauty brand using Meta’s CAPI saw a 21% increase in tracked conversions compared to pixel-only tracking.</p><h2>Step 2: Separate Trackable vs. Non-Trackable Channels</h2><p>Not all marketing efforts can be directly measured. Here’s how to categorize them:</p><h3>Non-Trackable Channels (ATL Marketing)</h3><ul><li>TV, radio, billboards, print ads<br></li><li>Hard to attribute directly to sales<br></li></ul><p><strong>Solution</strong>: Use Marketing Mix Modelling (MMM) to estimate their impact.</p><h3>Trackable Channels (Digital &amp; Influencer Marketing)</h3><ul><li>Paid social ads, influencer campaigns, email marketing<br></li><li>Should be precisely measured via UTM, promo codes, and analytics<br></li></ul><p><strong>Best Practice</strong>: Ensure all digital campaigns are properly tagged. Compare influencer-driven sales against other channels (e.g., paid ads).<br></p><h2>Step 3: Use Marketing Mix Modelling (MMM) for Holistic Measurement</h2><p>MMM helps quantify the impact of both trackable and non-trackable marketing efforts.</p><h3>How MMM Works</h3><ul><li><strong>Define Business Goals</strong> (e.g., sales, revenue, new customers).<br></li><li><strong>Input Historical Data</strong> (marketing spend, sales, external factors).<br></li><li><strong>Analyse Contribution</strong> of each channel (including influencer marketing).</li></ul><h3>Real-World Application<br></h3><p>A soda water brand used MMM to discover that:</p><ul><li>Influencers contributed 0.3% of total sales (much higher than projected, yet almost no measurable influence).<br></li><li>TV ads had minimal short-term impact but boosted long-term brand recognition.</li></ul><h3>Key Considerations for MMM</h3><ul><li>Calibrate with Trackable Data: Ensure MMM outputs align with digital metrics (e.g., Google Analytics).<br></li><li>Avoid Overestimating ATL Channels: Traditional media rarely drives immediate sales spikes.<br></li></ul><h2>Final Thoughts: Turning Data into Action</h2><p>Measuring influencer marketing isn’t just about proving ROI—it’s about optimizing future campaigns.</p><h3>Actionable Steps</h3><p><strong>✅ Set up tracking before launching campaigns</strong> (promo codes, UTMs, CAPI).<br><strong>✅ Focus on business outcomes, not vanity metrics</strong>.<br><strong>✅ Use MMM to measure both digital and traditional channels</strong>.<br><strong>✅ Continuously refine influencer selection based on performance data</strong>.</p><p>By adopting a data-driven approach, you’ll ensure every dollar spent on influencer marketing delivers measurable results.</p><h3>Need Help Measuring Your Influencer Campaigns?</h3><p>If tracking and analytics feel overwhelming, consider partnering with performance marketing experts who specialize in attribution modelling and ROAS optimization. Would you like a <a data-mce-href="https://morethandata.biz/minute-mmm" href="https://morethandata.biz/minute-mmm" title="free social media influencer measure and audit" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>free audit</strong></a> of your current influencer tracking setup?&nbsp;</p>

How to Measure Social Media Influencers’ Impact on Your Sales

More Than Data

An Australia Sydney-based pioneer in marketing analytics, offering a free, fast, and user-friendly marketing mix modelling platform. We help marketers build actionable marketing mix models in under 10 minutes for instant insights. Our software Minute MMM is free, DIY, and simple—no costly consultants, complex tools, or data expertise needed. Optimize marketing investments with ease!

Mulish

Sora

Merriweather

<p>Thank You to Our First 100 Clients and Users.</p>
<p>Your support helped shape our products and services—built to make media impact measurement accessible and affordable.</p>
<p>Starting 1 July 2025, Minute MMM and Budget Optimizer move to a paid model with monthly subscription and upfront payment options.</p>
<p>We're no longer free—but we're still powerful, affordable, and focused on your success.</p>

Blog

The Hidden Secrets of Marketing Mix Modeling Service Prov...

Mastering Marketing Analytics Without Breaking the Bank

Instant Insights: How Our Free Marketing Mix Platform Tra...

Why Google Meridian and Meta Robyn Fall Short in Marketin...

Upgrading Google Meridian: A Constrained Bayesian Approac...

How to Measure Social Media Influencers’ Impact on Your S...